For those of you that have, bear with me while I quickly summarize part of the show to those who haven't:
Lost is a show about a plane crash where the surviving passengers are stranded on a very mysterious island. While they're on the island they soon discover that they are not alone. The island is inhabited by the Others - people that have wild and ferocious exteriors and have mannerisms that resemble savages. By the end of the show we meet and learn more about the Others and how a lot of them are good people that center their lives around a spiritual foundation, trying to survive.
To me, Queequeg is an Other.
Queequeg! |
In class today we talked about how Queequeg essentially embodies the new age. He is the character that is different and foreign to the others. He's not the mainstream sailor boy. He is feared by many and catches the attention of passerby's. He doesn't fit the conventional American sailor like many of them do. He's of different race, different status, different religion... heck, he even enjoys sharing a bed with complete strangers! Despite these things, we soon unearth that he is perhaps, more civilized than the other characters on board the ship (minus the cannibalism thing).
Ishmael, anyone? |
Over time though, we see Ishmael gradually tolerate Queequeg and that tolerance then becomes friendship and sincere care. The whole progression of their relationship is similar to a relationship founded in digital culture. We come across someone who at first glance, may not be the most inviting (or sane) looking person, but as you allow yourself to understand them more, rather than trying to get them to understand you, then your relationship deepens and you have formed a strong bond. Just like that of Ishmael and Queequeg.
I definitely relate to a digital pressure you were describing as far as judging others based on their Facebook posts. I rarely go on Facebook because unfortunately the majority of the time, I'm too caught up in how my friend is doing cooler stuff or is way more photogenic or has the "perfect" life, etc. It's so easy to perceive falsely or make inaccurate judgments because you're connecting a created life with an actual living person. Crazy! Don't get me wrong, I think Facebook is great and love the advancing technology. However, I think you're right on the money when it comes to the issues that this book poses that reflect our modern digital culture!
ReplyDeleteBrittany, you just reminded me of an article about how frequency of checking Facebook is linked to decreased well-being or depression (read the study here: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0069841).
ReplyDeleteShelly: I feel like even the word "judge" is so loaded now that I try to stay away from it. Clearly we have to make judgments in life, but have you ever read or been a part of an online conversation that looks like this?
Person 1: Brings up a topic of discussion.
Person 2: Wow, that's so terrible of you.
Person 3: Person 2 is SO judgmental!
Person 2: Stop judging me for being judgmental!
But seriously.
Good point on how comfortable we've become using the word "judge" and are quick to use it. I could be guilty of that. I have seen several conversations like that though. Not me personally since I got rid of my Facebook a year ago (I just really enjoy not having it), but I've got roommates that often stomp out of their rooms in frustration because of Facebook chat conversations or conversations on their "wall" that look similar to your example and they show it to me and other roommates, and I'm always surprised at how comfortable some people feel in using the internet to call people out so directly on their differences.
ReplyDeleteGreat post. I agree that it is interesting how the digital world has created new ways for us to judge each other, and even more quickly execute that judgement. For example, by openly disagreeing (or agreeing) with someone without having to say your disagreements to their face. Or just "deleting" someone as a friend on Facebook.It's a new form of judgment that hasn't existed before. Very interesting.
ReplyDelete